February 16, 2005 - Op-ed
For more information contact
Art or bioterrorism? Implications of the Kurtz case for research science and for limiting terrorist threats
Appeared in Bulletin of the International Network of Engineers and Scientists Against Proliferation, December 1, 2004
By
One spring morning in 2004, Professor Steven Kurtz of the State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo campus, woke to the horrid discovery that his wife of twenty years had died overnight from a heart attack. He called 9-1-1 for emergency services. Paramedics arriving at the Kurtz home noticed technical equipment that would normally only be found in a clinical or research laboratory. If the emergency responders had not been suspicious and had not acted on those suspicions, it would have been worrisome.
What happened later--the investigation of Kurtz and colleagues by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI's) Joint Task Force on Terrorism under bioterrorism statues--might have more worrisome implications for both academic research and limiting the threat of bioterrorism.
(To read the article, follow the publication link below.)

Art or Bioterrorism? Implications of the Kurtz Case for Research Science and for Limiting Terrorist Threats
Margaret E. Kosal
Bulletin of the International Network of Engineers and Scientists Against Proliferation vol. 24 (2004)
Topics: Bioterrorism | Terrorism and counterterrorism



About CISAC
Mailing List
@StanfordCISAC
Facebook
