Differences in Safety Climate between Hospital Personnel and Naval Aviators
Journal ArticleAuthors
David M. Gaba - Stanford University
Sara J. Singer - Stanford University
AD Sinaiko
Jennie Bowen
AP Ciavarelli
Published by
Human Factors, Vol. 45 no. 2, page(s) 173-185
Summer 2003
We compared results of safety climate survey questions from health care respondents with those from naval aviation, a high-reliability organization. Separate surveys containing a subset of 23 similar questions were conducted among employees from 15 hospitals and from naval aviators from 226 squadrons. For each question a "problematic response" was defined that suggested an absence of a safety climate. Overall, the problematic response rate was 5.6% for naval aviators versus 17.5% for hospital personnel (p<0.0001). The problematic response was 20.9% in high-hazard domains such as emergency departments and operating room. Problematic response among hospital workers was up to 12 times greater than that among aviators on certain questions.
CONCLUSION: Although further research on safety climate in health care is warranted, hospitals may need to make substantial changes to achieve a safety climate consistent with the status of high-reliability organizations.



About CISAC
Mailing List
@StanfordCISAC
Facebook
